Umělec magazine 1998/6-7 >> Šípek versus Přikryl List of all editions.
Šípek versus Přikryl
Umělec magazine
Year 1998, 6-7
2,50 EUR
Send the printed edition:
Order subscription

Šípek versus Přikryl

Umělec magazine 1998/6-7

01.06.1998

Lenka Lindaurová | architecture | en cs

New gallery spaces in Prague or other big cities have not appeared for a long time. They were always made through reconstruction of already existing spaces. During the lengthy reconstruction of the Modern and Contemporary Art Collection of the National Gallery in Veletržní palác, the Czech Fine Arts Museum opened its House at the Black Madonna, the Municipal Library and recently, at the time when Veletržní palác is trying to redo its permanent exhibition, the House at the Golden Ring. These are, however, institutions run by the state.
Yet, this year saw two monument reconstructions being finished and handed over to use for art exhibitions: Prague Castle’s Picture Gallery designed by architect Bořek Šípek and Benedikt Rejt Gallery in the town of Louny made by Emil Přikryl. On the first sight, the two projects seem incomparable. Both of them, however, serve art and both of them place high demands in their own way.
Prague Castle’s Picture Gallery has a long and turbulent history and serves to the Rudolfinian collection. It is determined by a number of reconstructions – most of the important ones were carried out in the course of this century. The most acclaimed Castle architect Josip Plečnik had not have the time to intervene with this space very much, making round windows in the northern wing of the former horse stable only as the space was meant to be turned into representation area. Otto Rothmayer was the one who made most radical changes here but his interventions were implemented and then redone throughout one single decade – the 50’s. The current reconstruction was continuing mostly in their tradition.
In 1996 the Prague Castle Management came to the decision to reconstruct the Picture Gallery according to Bořek Šípek’s design who has been improving the Castle for some time (entrance to the President’s offices, bridge over Chotkova Street). The reconstruction was assigned just before the law stating that contracts over 100.000 crowns ($3,500 US) had to go through a tender was approved and designer Šípek came to a very lucrative contract that would leave clear marks in the history of one of the most closely watched Czech buildings. Šípek is a professional but his work suffers from one impediment: postmodern macho character that lacks timelessness. This, surely, will be clear only after some time but we can already – in confrontation with previous reconstructions – find some evident mistakes.
The most obvious of them is something I would call stuffy self-presentation the architect is using to attract attention to himself, to his playful and talkative creations while downplaying visuality of art works themselves and the interior as a whole. The Renaissance horse stable with rolled vaults – one of them hiding a very complex system of square cartridges – are so visual on their own that it is not necessary to recreate them in any way. Colorful walls form bearable and fashionable decor and at the same time subdue light that is harmful to ancient works. The parquet flooring composed into squares is also all right and Ingo Maurer’s lights (a sort of double-layered rectangular pancake) are excellent. Their placement on the edge of the walls and vaults in horizontal position makes them invisible so the viewer can only see a lit vault but is not disturbed by the source of the light. The need of seating and additional light was solved in Šípek’s way: aggressively green, limping benches of round shape, massively upholstered with a step and a carpet in the middle accompanied with a marble table and black lamps. His object feels pleasantly ugly, his furnishing of the Picture Gallery has the feeling of a pseudo-revolutionary exhibition. The entrance room to the horse stable got a stone polished floor reflecting lights of two and only windows to the Jelení Příkop and is dominated by reconstructed ceiling by Otto Rothmayer, painted in blue with golden decoration. Šípek gave in to the original as he found the symbol of three-corner blossom appropriate and he used it also for the golden railing and handles on the doors. It was however useless for him to install a heavy railing construction made of massive metal with horizontal surface (repeated also on the door frames) which only functions as a helpful element for the wheelchair platform. Rothmayer’s hall called Karnak with a forest of black columns which was closed in 1959 is now separated, creating two spaces: a café and a part of the Picture Gallery. At the end of the café where Šípek’s design raped everything possible is a view of original foundations of the Virgin Mary church from the 9th Century placed in a kitschy staged wall. Šípek’s style, however, is not disturbing in the café and in fact has its place here: everything holds together as to the style and even material maintains certain sophistication. The strange thing is that nobody is willing to operate the café (sic! at the Castle) since the gallery attracts very few people.
The entrance hall and two smaller exhibition halls are pleasantly resolved as to their color and, with the exception of a few Šípekesque curls (door, chairs, tube-like golden lamps) they are easy to digest. One cannot deny that the reconstruction of the Picture Gallery was carried out in a broad-minded, even bombastic manner which naturally goes with head of states’ offices. The head of state also has a right to choose his collaborators and assign them to create conception of the Castle in their honorary post. The architect came up with the conception and the state paid 40 million crowns ($1,380,000 US).
Surprisingly, a more broad-minded project which a Czech viewer has up to now had a chance to see only in rich German and Swiss cities suddenly appeared in a small town. The town of Louny managed to reconstruct the local gallery space for 14 million crowns ($483.000 US) only, a project made by Emil Přikryl.
Reconstruction and finalization of this former brewery links to previous unfinished attempt from the totalitarian period which, naturally, didn’t make any sense and was thus ended in 1988. When approached by the Louny Gallery, Přikryl had been working at the known Liberec construction company SIAL. Similarly to the previous case, a tender was not organized for this reconstruction as the law at that time did not require to do so. The reconstruction has lasted for quite a while (three years) due to lack of financial sources and the architect had to work with a small local company. His local collaborators had to meet his high demands and make literally home-made parts. The visitor, however, has no clue that there are now big foreign companies behind all the elegant details.
The reconstruction needed to tolerate only some historic elements of this often rebuilt construction (vaults and columns in the basement). The only other limitations represented financial resources only. The monumental, strict and functional building can nevertheless be compared with similar constructions Germany.
The entrance is defined by simple metal gate and a front wall without any disturbing element. Light at the entrance part is coming through round tunnels in the roof which, from the outside, look like miniature observatory equipment. The main hall and entrance form strictly geometrical spaces determined by ashlar shape: columns, cash-register, a concrete tunnel of the elevator that cuts through all the floors (for the time being the first basement level is open to public, two remaining levels are still to be finished). Cast iron heating at the entrance is attached horizontally and painted black which makes it look a bit like objects by Donald Judd. The architect keeps the spaces adjacent to this main area (side spaces, stairways, tower, etc.), only changing their volume and proportion by utilizing light vistas, experimenting and generally making the strict geometrical shape of the core of the building more interesting. Round windows often appear in these side spaces, the walls are star-shaped, columns are suggested and even a vista to a stairway appears here. The destroyed interior of the corner tower gave way to a visual object that resigned to provisory functions. The internal architectural corpus is ending under the roof with the edges lined by daylight. A concrete prism erotically moves through a round opening to the second basement level which still boasts with Renaissance vault and columns. One large hall here is surrounded by two smaller spaces. One of their interesting features include different height of the floors and a ramp-like entrance into the lower part of the spaces. This unusual solution provides great service for the works exhibited here: the room was vaulted from the floor and by lowering the floor, new walls were created.
The internal parget has “humane” natural form in the color of concrete – in a smoothed out form it is also used for the floors slightly floating in the space as they are not directly attached to the walls. Electricity circuits and switches are hidden in little canals in the floor covered with a removable metal plate. The remaining parts and equipment are also made of metal: technical lights on platforms, railing, handles and door frames, wash basins and faucets. The space lacks any malicious intrusions in the form of tubes, electricity circuits in the walls, technical tricks that would take away space from the art works. All the technical tools necessary for operating an art space are neatly hidden in closed spaces in the walls while fire extinguishers are admitted with full force. The building’s interiors, however, are not as sterile as, say, BP’s gas station toilets. Human traces are visible everywhere. The space does not have the feeling of a spaceship but rather a medieval cathedral. The permanent Louny Gallery’s exhibition is known for its qualities and fits in the building perfectly. Přikryl’s project respected the collection and visitors in the first place. Sýkora, Mirvald, Kubíček, Kratina, Malich, Boštík, Šimotová, Kolíbal... they all appear in an extraordinary place whose qualities are not unfortunately a standard here.
Placed on an entrance area in front of the building are nine bare columns made of ordinary gray logs, filling up space that is dedicated to a building on street level to be built in the future. The two and a half meter high metal signs bearing the gallery’s title are surprising at the first sight, unusual at the second and interesting at the third. While some locals may be at loss visiting the gallery, in the context of world architecture, the building represents a well-performed reconstruction with overall conservative function. In a situation when Czech art is often exhibited underground and state galleries are becoming sterile closed institutions, the Louny Gallery is more of a rarity which should gain from this unique position as much as possible. It was born at a time when monsters like Guggenheim Bilbao are constructed while art is moving into empty buildings and factories. In Louny, something in between created a meaningful gallery.
Finally: why am I comparing Šípek and Přikryl? The above text suggests their two opposite approaches: an exhibitionistic one and a reflexive approach. Šípek’s project represents tourist’s mentality of the Castle with general disability to think in timeless terms while Přikryl’s reconstruction is a clear example of thinking of the future with regard to realistic possibilities, yet with an effort to maintain high quality.

Translated by Vladan Šír.
(pages 16 through 19)




01.06.1998

Comments

There are currently no comments.

Add new comment

Recommended articles

Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille
We’re constantly hearing that someone would like to do some joint project, organize something together, some event, but… damn, how to put it... we really like what you’re doing but it might piss someone off back home. Sure, it’s true that every now and then someone gets kicked out of this institution or that institute for organizing something with Divus, but weren’t they actually terribly self…
Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
No Future For Censorship No Future For Censorship
Author dreaming of a future without censorship we have never got rid of. It seems, that people don‘t care while it grows stronger again.
Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon
There is nothing that has not already been done in culture, squeezed or pulled inside out, blown to dust. Classical culture today is made by scum. Those working in the fine arts who make paintings are called artists. Otherwise in the backwaters and marshlands the rest of the artists are lost in search of new and ever surprising methods. They must be earthbound, casual, political, managerial,…
ArtLeaks
27.07.2014 19:39
Where to go next?
out - archeology
S.d.Ch, Solitaires and Periphery Culture (a generation born around 1970)
S.d.Ch, Solitaires and Periphery Culture (a generation born around 1970)
Josef Jindrák
Who is S.d.Ch? A person of many interests, active in various fields—literature, theater—known for his comics and collages in the art field. A poet and playwright foremost. A loner by nature and determination, his work doesn’t meet the current trends. He always puts forth personal enunciation, although its inner structure can get very complicated. It’s pleasant that he is a normal person and a…
Read more...
out - poetry
THC Review and the Condemned Past
THC Review and the Condemned Past
Ivan Mečl
We are the fifth global party! Pítr Dragota and Viki Shock, Fragmenty geniality / Fragments of Charisma, May and June 1997. When Viki came to visit, it was only to show me some drawings and collages. It was only as an afterthought that he showed me the Czech samizdat publication from the late 1990s, THC Review. When he saw how it fascinated me, he panicked and insisted that THAT creation is…
Read more...
prize
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
Read more...
birthing pains
Who’s Afraid of Motherhood?
Who’s Afraid of Motherhood?
Zuzana Štefková
Expanding the definition of “mother” is also a space for reducing pressure and for potential liberation.1 Carol Stabile The year was 2003, and in the deep forests of Lapák in the Kladno area, a woman in the later phase of pregnancy stopped along the path. As part of the “Artists in the Woods” exhibit, passers-by could catch a glimpse of her round belly, which she exposed especially for them in…
Read more...
Books, video, editions and artworks that might interest you Go to e-shop
1997, 24.5 x 35.5 cm, Pen & Ink Drawing
More info...
558 EUR
From series of rare photographs never released before year 2012. Signed and numbered Edition. Photography on 1cm high white...
More info...
220 EUR
From series of rare photographs never released before year 2012. Signed and numbered Edition. Photography on 1cm high white...
More info...
220 EUR
20.5 x 30.5 cm, B/W Collage
More info...
900 EUR

Studio

Divus and its services

Studio Divus designs and develops your ideas for projects, presentations or entire PR packages using all sorts of visual means and media. We offer our clients complete solutions as well as all the individual steps along the way. In our work we bring together the most up-to-date and classic technologies, enabling us to produce a wide range of products. But we do more than just prints and digital projects, ad materials, posters, catalogues, books, the production of screen and space presentations in interiors or exteriors, digital work and image publication on the internet; we also produce digital films—including the editing, sound and 3-D effects—and we use this technology for web pages and for company presentations. We specialize in ...
 

Citation of the day. Publisher is not liable for any mental and physical states which may arise after reading the quote.

Enlightenment is always late.
CONTACTS AND VISITOR INFORMATION The entire editorial staff contacts

DIVUS NOVA PERLA
Kyjov 36-37, 407 47 Krásná Lípa
Czech Republic

Gallery, Bookshop and Cafe
open from Wednesday to Sunday
between 11am to 10pm

and on appointment
at shop@divus.cz, +420 606 606 425

 

Divus Perla
Gábina Náhlíková, gabina@divus.cz, +420 604 254 994


Divus Publishing
Ivan Mečl, ivan@divus.cz, +420 602 269 888

 

Design, Pre-Press and Printing Studio Divus
studio@divus.cz

 

Magazine Umělec
Palo Fabuš, umelec@divus.cz

 

Cafe, Bookshop & Library
Hana Turynová, shop@divus.cz, +420 606 606 425

DIVUS LONDON
Arch 8, Resolution Way, Deptford
London SE8 4NT, United Kingdom

news@divus.org.uk, +44 (0) 7526 902 082

 

DIVUS BERLIN
berlin@divus.cz


DIVUS WIEN
wien@divus.cz


DIVUS MEXICO CITY
mexico@divus.cz


DIVUS BARCELONA
barcelona@divus.cz

DIVUS MOSCOW & MINSK
alena@divus.cz

DIVUS NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION
Divus We Are Rising National Gallery For You! Go to Kyjov by Krásná Lípa no.37.